Dalmatia and the Banate of Croatia in Pavlinović’s Puti (Godine 1867–75)

Authors

  • Krystyna Pieniążek-Marković Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu / Univerza Adama Mickiewicza v Poznanju

Keywords:

national revival, integration, cultural landscape, southern and northern Croatia, travelogue

Abstract

The aim of this article is to reconstruct two landscapes that Mihovil Pavlinović constructs in the introductory pages of his travelogue Puti (Godine 1867–75). The political activity of this Dalmatian priest is directed at the unification of the Croatian provinces and the Croatization of the detached and alienated (urban and island) Dalmatia. To achieve his goal, this national revival traveler-narrator builds two conflicting images of southern and northern Croatia. The article shows which stylistic means he uses and how he tries to influence the reader—that is, to gain supporters for Dalmatia’s annexation of the Banate of Croatia. Referring to polysensory experiences, including basic physiological needs, Pavlinović constructs opposing worlds and opposing spaces: a northern Croatian paradise on earth and a southern Croatian dead, burial ground (a world of day and night). It also shows the close connection of culture and mentality with space, landscape, and nature. The provinces of the Triune Kingdom, in its realization and in accordance with the tasks of revival literature, represent literary ideological landscapes. My research is grounded in humanistic geography and spatial reversal.

References

Marja Boršnik (ur.), 1966: Ivan Tavčar Zbrano delo. Ljubljana: DZS.

Jean Chevalier, Alain Gheerbrant, 1983: Rječnik simbola: mitovi, sni, običaji, geste, oblici, likovi, boje, brojevi. Prev. A. Buljan, D. Bučan, F. Vučak, M. Vekarić, N. Grujić. Zagreb: NZMH, Mladost.

Denis Cosgrove, 1998: Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape. London: Croom Helm.

Mary Douglas, 1966: Purity and Danger. An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. New York: Praeger. Polj. izd. Mary Douglas, 2007: Czystość i zmaza. Analiza pojęć nieczystości i tabu. Prev. M. Bucholc. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.

Miran Hladnik, 2012: Prostor v slovenskih literarnovednih študijah. Slavistična revija 60/3. 271–282.

Miran Hladnik, Jerneja Fridl, 2012: Prostor v slovenski zgodovinski povesti in nje¬gova geografska prezentacija. Slavistična revija 60/3. 431–442.

Dawid Howes, (ur.) 2006: Empire of the Senses. The Sensual Culture Reader. Oxford: Berg.

John B. Harley, 2001: The New Nature of Maps: Essays in the History of Cartography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Katarina Ivon, 2012: Mihovil Pavlinović u Narodnom koledaru. Primjer kompleksnog osobnog imaginarija druge polovine XIX. stoljeća. Radovi Zavoda za povijesne znanosti HAZU u Zadru 54. 251–272.

Stipe Kljaić, 2018: Postrevolucionarni konzervativizam političara i svećenika don Mihovila Pavlinovića. Crkva u svijetu 53/4. 627–646.

Don Mitchel, 2008: Krajolik. Prev. D. Lalović. Kulturna geografia. Kritički rječnik ključnih pojmova. Ur. D. Atkinson, P. Jackson, D. Siblez, N. Washbourne. Zagreb: Disput. 81–90.

Pavao Pavličić, 2007: Epika granice. Zagreb: Matica hrvatska.

Mihovil Pavlinović, 1888: Puti (Godine 1867–75). Zadar: Brzotiskom „Narodnoga lista”.

Urška Perenič, 2012: Prostor v literaturi in literatura v prostoru. Slavistična revija 60/3. 259–264.

Magdalena Rembowska-Płuciennik, 2010: Dlaczego warto wrócić do zmysłów? Wokół literaturoznawczych inspiracji antropologią zmysłów. Jaka antropologia literatury jest dzisiaj możliwa? Ur. P. Czapliński, A. Legeżyńska, M. Telicki. Poznań: Wydawnictwo »Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne«.

Paul Rodaway, 1994: Sensuos Geography. London: Routledge.

Elżbieta Rybicka, 2014: Geopoetyka. Przestrzeń i miejsce we współczesnych teoriach i praktykach literackich. Kraków: Universitas.

Bernard Sharrat, 2001: Writing Britains. British Cultural Studies: Geography, Nationality, and Identity. Ur. D. Morley, K. Robins. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Janusz Sławiński, (ur.) 1989: Słownik terminów literackich. Wrocław-Warszawa- Kraków-Gdańsk-Łódź: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.

Ola Söderström, 2008: Reprezentacija. Kulturna geografia. Kritički rječnik ključnih pojmova. Ur. D. Atkinson, P. Jackson, D. Siblez, N. Washbourne. Prev. D. Lalović. Zagreb: Disput. 35–40.

Nikša Stančić, 1980: Hrvatska nacionalna ideologija preporodnog pokreta u Dalmaciji — Mihovil Pavlinović i njegov krug do 1869. Zagreb: Institut za hrvatsku povijest Sveučilišta u Zagrebu (monografije, knj. 11).

Jola Škulj, 2004: Literature and space: textual, artistic and cultural spaces of tran¬sgressiveness. Primerjalna književnost 27/Special Issue. 20–37.

Yi-Fu Tuan, 1987: Przestrzeń i miejsce. Prev. A. Morawińska. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.

Barney Warf, Santa Arias (ed.), 2009: Introduction: the Reinsertion of Space into the Social Sciences and Humanities. The Spatial Turn. Ur. B. Warf, S. Arias. London, New York: Routledge. 1–10.

Benedikta Zelić-Bučan, 1978: Don Mihovilo Pavlinović – hrvatski preporoditelj i političar. Crkva u svijetu 13/1. 59–70.

Benedikta Zelić-Bučan, 1982: Hrvatski preporod u Dalmaciji i Mihovil Pavlinović. Crkva u svijetu 17/4. 386–395.

Published

2020-03-06

How to Cite

Pieniążek-Marković, K. (2020) “Dalmatia and the Banate of Croatia in Pavlinović’s Puti (Godine 1867–75)”, Slavistična revija, 68(1), pp. 91–102. Available at: https://srl.si/ojs/srl/article/view/2020-1-1-6 (Accessed: 24 November 2024).

Issue

Section

ARTICLES