A Critical Multimodal Analysis of the Soviet Satirical Publication Crocodile

Authors

  • Denis Hacin Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57589/srl.v71i1.4034

Keywords:

critical discourse analysis, ideology, Fairclough, Bakhtin, comic

Abstract

The article puts forward a critical multimodal analysis of the satirical Soviet publication Крокодил (Crocodile), drawing on the methodologies of Norman Fairclough, Gunter Kress, and Theo van Leeuwen. The question at hand pertains to how the magazine encoded and disseminated the dominant ideological forms, thereby consolidating the political power of the Communist Party. More precisely, the analysis focuses on the representations of Soviet life and the contrasting images of a capitalist, antagonistic West. The multimodal material may be categorized into two groups: texts whose primary purpose is entertainment (satire) and texts which the reader must interpret seriously (solemnity). Differentiation between them is possible at the level of both content and form. What is more, these groups may be divided even further into several subgroups.

References

Mihail Mihajlovič Bahtin idr., 2005: Marksizmi in Jezikoslovje: Bahtin/Vološinov, Stalin, Williams. Ur. Lev Centrih. Ljubljana: Društvo za sodobno družbenopolitično polemiko – Agregat.

Drago Bajt, 2016: Kar je Sonce za Luno, to je Rusija za nas: kaj je socialistični realizem. Ljubljana: Literarno-umetniško društvo Literatura.

Will Eisner, 1985: Comics & Sequential Art. Tamarac: Poorhouse Press.

Norman Fairclough, 1989: Language and Power. New York: Longman Inc.

Norman Fairclough, 1995: Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Harlow: Longman Group Ltd.

Miha Javornik, 1999: Nesklenjenost Bahtinove misli kot njena odlika (kaj sploh je dialog?). Bahtin, M. Mihail. Estetika in humanistične vede. Ljubljana: SH – Zavod za založniško dejavnost.

Gunther Kress, Theo van Leeuwen, 2006: Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. Abingdon: Routledge.

David Machin, Andrea Mayr, 2012: How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE Publications.

Scott McCloud, 1994: Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. New York: Harper Perennial.

Aleksander Skaza, 1999: Estetski humanizem Mihaila Bahtina. Bahtin, M. Mihail. Estetika in humanistične vede. Ljubljana: SH – Zavod za založniško dejavnost.

Richard Stites, 1989: Revolutionary Dreams: Utopian Vision and Experimental Life in the Russian Revolution. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Andreja Vezovnik, 2008: Kritična diskurzivna analiza v kontekstu sodobnih diskurzivnih teorij. Družbenoslovne razprave 24/57. 79–96. Tudi na spletu.

Борис Ефимов, 2000: Десять десятилетий: О том, что видел, пережил, запомнил. Москва: Вагирус.

[Boris Efimov, 2000: Desjat' desjatiletij: O tom, čto videl, prežil, zapomnil. Moskva: Vagirus.]

Правда, 1951: Крокодил 1951/18. 11.

[Pravda, 1951: Krokodil 1951/18. 11.]

Правда, 1951: Крокодил 1951/33. 8.

[Pravda, 1951: Krokodil 1951/33. 8.]

Сергей Стыкалин, Инна Кременская, 1963: Советская сатирическая печать 1917–1963. Москва: Государственное издательство политической литературы.

[Sergej Stykalin, Inna Kremenskaja, 1963: Sovetskaja satiričeskaja pečat’ 1917–1963. Moskva: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo političeskoj literatury.]

Published

2023-05-05

How to Cite

Hacin, D. (2023) “A Critical Multimodal Analysis of the Soviet Satirical Publication Crocodile”, Slavistična revija, 71(1), pp. 17–28. doi: 10.57589/srl.v71i1.4034.

Issue

Section

ARTICLES