Primary Categories of Dialogue Acts

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57589/srl.v71i1.4062

Keywords:

dialogue act, speech act, corpus pragmatics, corpus annotation

Abstract

The paper addresses dialogue act annotation in speech corpora. Using existing generic schemes for dialogue act annotation, number of drawbacks are experienced, therefore the primary dialogue act categories are redefined and evaluated based on authentic speech data annotation, done by two independent annotators. The results confirm appropriateness of the defined dialogue act categories for empirical use as well as point out the ambiguous and borderline cases that need to be addressed in the future.

References

Karin Aijmer, Christoph Rühlemann, 2015: Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jan Alexandersson, Bianka Buschbeck-Wolf, Tsutomu Fujinami, Elisabeth Maier, Norbert Reithinger, Birte Schmitz, Melanie Siegel, 1997: Dialogue Acts in VERBMOBIL-2. Report 204. DFKI GmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany. Na spletu.

James Allen, Mark Core, 1997: Draft of DAMSL: Dialog Act Markup in Several Layers. Na spletu.

AMI, 2005: Guidelines for Dialogue Act and Addressee Annotation Version 1.0. Na spletu.

John L. Austin, 1990: Kako napravimo kaj z besedami. Ljubljana: Studia humanitatis.

Penelope Brown, Stephen Levinson, 1987: Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge.

Harry Bunt, Jan Alexandersson, Jean Carletta, Jae-Woong Choe, Alex Chengyu Fang, Koiti Hasida, Kiyong Lee, Volha Petukhova, Andrei Popescu-Belis, Laurent Romary, Claudia Soria, David Traum, 2010: Towards an ISO standard for dialogue act annotation. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'10). Malta: European Language Resources Association (ELRA). Na spletu.

Harry Bunt, Volha Petukhova, Andrei Malchanau, Alex Fang, Kars Wijnhoven, 2019: The DialogBank: dialogues with interoperable anntations. Language Resources and Evaluation 53. 213–49.

Alexander Clark, Andrei Popescu-Belis, 2004: Multi-level Dialogue Act Tags. Zbornik konference 5th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue at HLT-NAACL. Cambridge: Association for Computational Linguistics. 163–70.

Jacob Cohen, 1968: Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin 70. 213–20.

Daria Dayter, 2014: Dealing with interactionally risky speech acts in simultaneous interpreting: The case of self-praise. Journal of Pragmatics 174. 28–42.

Rajdip Dhillon, Sonali Bhagat, Hannah Carvey, Elisabeth Shriberg, 2004: Meeting Recorder Project: Dialog Act Labeling Guide. ICSI Technical Report TR-04-002. Na spletu.

Ekkehard Felder, Marcus Müller, Friedemann Vogel (ur.), 2011: Korpuspragmatik: Thematische Korpora als Basis diskurslinguistischer Anakysen. Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter.

Matejka Grgič, Igor Ž. Žagar, 2004: Čas in dejanje v jeziku: oblikovanje performativne teorije na Slovenskem. Ljubljana: Založba CF.

Herbert Paul Grice, 1975: Logic and conversation. Speech Acts. Ur. P. Cole, J. L. Morgan. New York: Academic Press. 41–58.

Meta Grosman, 1997: Kritika kot govorno dejanje. Slavistična revija 45/1-2. 269–92.

Sonja Hudej, 2002: Uspešnost uresničevanja tvorčevega namena v šestih besedilnih vrstah. Slavistična revija 50/1. 61–81.

Ken Hyland, 2005: Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writting. London, New York: Continuum.

ISO 24617-2, 2012: Language resource management – Semantic annotation framework (SemAF): Part 2: Dialogue acts. Reference number ISO 24617-2:2012(E). Geneva.

Dan Jurafsky, 2004: Pragmatics and computational linguistics. The Handbook of Pragmatics. Ur. Laurence R. Horn, Gregory Ward. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 578–604.

Daniel Jurafsky, Elisabeth Shriberg, Debra Biasca, 1997: Switchboard SWBD-DAMSL shallow-discourse-function annotation. Coders manual, draft 13. University of Colorado at Boulder, +SRI International. Na spletu.

John M. Kirk, 2013: Beyond the Structural Levels of Language: An Introduction to the SPICE-Ireland Corpus and its Uses. After the storm: Papers from the Forum for Research on the Languages of Scotland and Ulster Triennial Meeting. Ur. Janet Cruickshank, Robert McColl Millar. Aberdeen: Forum for Research on the Languages of Scotland and Ireland. 207–32.

Marion Klein, 1999: An overview of the state of the art of coding schemes for dialogue act annotation. TSD – Text, Speech and Dialogue. Ur. Václav Matousek, Pavel Mautner, Jana Ocelíková, Petr Sojka. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. 274–79.

Mira Krajnc Ivič, 2010: Jezikovno-vedenjski vzorci opravičevanja v slovenščini. Slavistična revija 58/1. 133–47.

Geoffrey Leech, Martin Weisser, Andrew Wilson, Martine Grice, 1998: LE-EAGLES-WP4-4: Integrated Resources Working Group Survey and Guidelines for the Representation and Annotation of Dialogue. Na spletu.

Stephen C. Levinson, 1983: Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stephen C. Levinson, 2017: Speech acts. The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. Ur. Yan Huang. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 199–216. Na spletu.

Charles W. Morris, 1938: Foundations of the theory of signs. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. Ur. Otto Neurath, Rudolf Carnap, Charles W. Morris. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 77–138.

Mojca Nidorfer - Šiškovič, 2004: Kako izrekamo zahteve. Moderno v slovenskem jeziku, literaturi in kulturi: zbornik predavanj. Ur. Marko Stabej. Ljubljana: Center za slovenščino kot drugi/tuji jezik pri Oddelku za slovenistiko Filozofske fakultete. 182–6.

Jesús Romero-Trillo (ur.), 2008: Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics: A Mutualistic Entente. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Deborah Schiffrin, 1987: Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

John R. Searle, 1979: Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press.

Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker, Jukka Tuominen (ur.), 2014: Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Darinka Verdonik, 2020a: Označevanje dialoških dejanj v korpusih. Slavistična revija 68/3. 373–90. Na spletu.

Darinka Verdonik, 2020b: The GORDAN scheme for dialogue act annotation - version 1.0: technical report. Na spletu.

Darinka Verdonik, 2022a. Annotating dialogue acts in speech data: problematic issues and basic dialogue act categories. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. Na spletu.

Darinka Verdonik, 2022b. Discourse markers and dialogue act annotation for computational dialogue systems. Discourse Markers in Interaction: From Production to Comprehension. Ur. Maria Josep Cuenca, Liesbeth Degand, Qiang Wang. Berlin: De Gruyter (Trends in linguistics. Studies and monographs, 376). 191–213.

Darinka Verdonik, Iztok Kosem, Ana Zwitter Vitez, Simon Krek, Marko Stabej, 2013: Compilation, transcription and usage of a reference speech corpus: the case of the Slovene corpus GOS. Language Resources and Evaluation 47/4. 1031–48.

Martin Weisser, 2019a: The DART annotation scheme: form, applicability & application. Studia Neophilologica 91/2. 131–53.

Martin Weisser, 2019b: The DART Taxonomy v. 3. Na spletu.

Martin Weisser, 2020: Speech acts in corpus pragmatics: Making the case for an extended taxonomy. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 25/4. 400–25.

Deirdre Wilson, Dan Sperber, 2012: Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge University Press.

Renata Zadravec Pešec, 1994: Pragmatično jezikoslovje: Temeljni pojmi. Ljubljana: Center za diskurzivne študije, Pedagoški inštitut pri Univerzi v Ljubljani.

Igor Ž. Žagar, 2018: Od performativa do govornih dejanj. 2. pregledana izdaja. Ljubljana: Pedagoški inštitut.

Published

2023-05-05

How to Cite

Verdonik, D. (2023) “Primary Categories of Dialogue Acts”, Slavistična revija, 71(1), pp. 43–60. doi: 10.57589/srl.v71i1.4062.

Issue

Section

ARTICLES